Author : R. Bronson
Publisher :
ISBN 13 : 9781691202645
Total Pages : 66 pages
Book Rating : 4.49/5 ( download)
Book Synopsis Florida Black Letter Citations by : R. Bronson
Download or read book Florida Black Letter Citations written by R. Bronson and published by . This book was released on 2019-09-05 with total page 66 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Black letter laws are legal rules that are so established or engrained in our jurisprudence that they are no longer subject to reasonable dispute. In your line of work--that is, legal writing--you often refer to black letter laws to state the various standards that an appellate court should apply to the cases under its review. The goal of this book is to make that job easier.This book is organized by general topics, each containing succinct propositions of appellate review. Each proposition is then followed by one or more case citations from the Florida Supreme Court and each of the five district courts of appeal. Each citation also includes an excerpt from the case that supports the stated proposition. The objective is to allow you to quickly and easily craft strong sentences about appellate review by using the language and case citations contained in this book. For example, say you are representing the appellee in an appeal over an evidentiary ruling, but the appellant did not object to the introduction of the evidence. Using the language and case citations in this book, you could quickly craft the following paragraph:The standard of review that applies is an abuse of discretion, and if reasonable people could disagree about the propriety of the trial court's decision, this court must affirm. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980) ('In reviewing a true discretionary act, the appellate court must fully recognize the superior vantage point of the trial judge and should apply the "reasonableness" test to determine whether the trial judge abused his discretion. If reasonable men could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, then the action is not unreasonable and there can be no finding of an abuse of discretion. The discretionary ruling of the trial judge should be disturbed only when his decision fails to satisfy this test of reasonableness."); see also Adams v. Adams, 511 So. 2d 743, 744 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) ("Because reasonable men could disagree, there was no abuse of discretion . . . ."). However, Appellant did not object to the introduction of the evidence at issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the issue Appellant presents is not preserved for this court's review. See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Carter, 848 So. 2d 365, 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ("Nothing is more basic to our function as a court of review than the principle that error, other than fundamental error, must be preserved by an appropriate objection in the trial court." (first citing Dober v. Worrell, 401 So.2d 1322, 1323-24 (Fla.1981); then citing Keech v. Yousef, 815 So.2d 718, 719-20 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); and then citing Smithwick v. Television 12 of Jacksonville, Inc., 730 So.2d 795, 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999))). Accordingly, Appellant cannot meet her burden of showing that an error has occured, see Livingston v. State, 219 So. 3d 911, 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("It is axiomatic that the appellant 'bears the burden of demonstrating that an error occurred in the trial court.' " (quoting Goodwin v. State, 751 So. 2d 537, 544 (Fla. 1999))), and this court must therefore affirm.That is a winning paragraph, and it was constructed in a matter of minutes using the propositions and case law provided in this book. With this book, you will be able to easily and quickly craft strong statements regarding appellate review as well.About the author: R. Bronson is a licensed attorney who has practiced in Florida for the last eight years. His primary focus has been the study and practice of appellate law. He currently serves as an elbow clerk for a district court of appeal judge.
