A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review

Download A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
ISBN 13 : 1139462814
Total Pages : 7 pages
Book Rating : 4.15/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review by : W. J. Waluchow

Download or read book A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review written by W. J. Waluchow and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2006-12-25 with total page 7 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy.

A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review

Download A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher :
ISBN 13 : 9780511274800
Total Pages : 283 pages
Book Rating : 4.07/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review by : Wilfrid J. Waluchow

Download or read book A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review written by Wilfrid J. Waluchow and published by . This book was released on 2007 with total page 283 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:

Judges and Unjust Laws

Download Judges and Unjust Laws PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : University of Michigan Press
ISBN 13 : 0472034154
Total Pages : 336 pages
Book Rating : 4.54/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Judges and Unjust Laws by : Douglas E. Edlin

Download or read book Judges and Unjust Laws written by Douglas E. Edlin and published by University of Michigan Press. This book was released on 2010-07-22 with total page 336 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Are judges legally obligated to enforce an unjust law?

Intention, Supremacy and the Theories of Judicial Review

Download Intention, Supremacy and the Theories of Judicial Review PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : Routledge
ISBN 13 : 1317517601
Total Pages : 148 pages
Book Rating : 4.03/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Intention, Supremacy and the Theories of Judicial Review by : John McGarry

Download or read book Intention, Supremacy and the Theories of Judicial Review written by John McGarry and published by Routledge. This book was released on 2016-07-28 with total page 148 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In the late 1980s, a vigorous debate began about how we may best justify, in constitutional terms, the English courts’ jurisdiction to judicially review the exercise of public power derived from an Act of Parliament. Two rival theories emerged in this debate, the ultra vires theory and the common law theory. The debate between the supporters of these two theories has never satisfactorily been resolved and has been criticised as being futile. Yet, the debate raises some fundamental questions about the constitution of the United Kingdom, particularly: the relationship between Parliament and the courts; the nature of parliamentary supremacy in the contemporary constitution; and the possibility and validity of relying on legislative intent. This book critically analyses the ultra vires and common law theories and argues that neither offers a convincing explanation for the courts’ judicial review jurisdiction. Instead, the author puts forward the theory that parliamentary supremacy – and, in turn, the relationship between Parliament and the courts – is not absolute and does not operate in a hard and fast way but, rather, functions in a more flexible way and that the courts will balance particular Acts of Parliament against competing statutes or principles. McGarry argues that this new conception of parliamentary supremacy leads to an alternative theory of judicial review which significantly differs from both the ultra vires and common law theories. This book will be of great interest to students and scholars of UK public law.

The Doctrine of Judicial Review

Download The Doctrine of Judicial Review PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher :
ISBN 13 :
Total Pages : 200 pages
Book Rating : 4.2R/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis The Doctrine of Judicial Review by : Edward Samuel Corwin

Download or read book The Doctrine of Judicial Review written by Edward Samuel Corwin and published by . This book was released on 1914 with total page 200 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:

Democracy and Distrust

Download Democracy and Distrust PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : Harvard University Press
ISBN 13 : 0674263294
Total Pages : 281 pages
Book Rating : 4.91/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Democracy and Distrust by : John Hart Ely

Download or read book Democracy and Distrust written by John Hart Ely and published by Harvard University Press. This book was released on 1981-08-15 with total page 281 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This powerfully argued appraisal of judicial review may change the face of American law. Written for layman and scholar alike, the book addresses one of the most important issues facing Americans today: within what guidelines shall the Supreme Court apply the strictures of the Constitution to the complexities of modern life? Until now legal experts have proposed two basic approaches to the Constitution. The first, “interpretivism,” maintains that we should stick as closely as possible to what is explicit in the document itself. The second, predominant in recent academic theorizing, argues that the courts should be guided by what they see as the fundamental values of American society. John Hart Ely demonstrates that both of these approaches are inherently incomplete and inadequate. Democracy and Distrust sets forth a new and persuasive basis for determining the role of the Supreme Court today. Ely’s proposal is centered on the view that the Court should devote itself to assuring majority governance while protecting minority rights. “The Constitution,” he writes, “has proceeded from the sensible assumption that an effective majority will not unreasonably threaten its own rights, and has sought to assure that such a majority not systematically treat others less well than it treats itself. It has done so by structuring decision processes at all levels in an attempt to ensure, first, that everyone’s interests will be represented when decisions are made, and second, that the application of those decisions will not be manipulated so as to reintroduce in practice the sort of discrimination that is impermissible in theory.” Thus, Ely’s emphasis is on the procedural side of due process, on the preservation of governmental structure rather than on the recognition of elusive social values. At the same time, his approach is free of interpretivism’s rigidity because it is fully responsive to the changing wishes of a popular majority. Consequently, his book will have a profound impact on legal opinion at all levels—from experts in constitutional law, to lawyers with general practices, to concerned citizens watching the bewildering changes in American law.

Judicial Review and the Constitution

Download Judicial Review and the Constitution PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : Bloomsbury Publishing
ISBN 13 : 1847311873
Total Pages : 480 pages
Book Rating : 4.70/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Judicial Review and the Constitution by : Christopher Forsyth

Download or read book Judicial Review and the Constitution written by Christopher Forsyth and published by Bloomsbury Publishing. This book was released on 2000-05-01 with total page 480 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This collection of essays presents opposing sides of the debate over the foundations of judicial review. In this work,however, the discussion of whether the 'ultra vires' doctrine is best characterised as a central principle of administrative law or as a harmless, justificatory fiction is located in the highly topical and political context of constitutional change. The thorough jurisprudential analysis of the relative merits of models of 'legislative intention' and 'judicial creativity' provides a sound base for consideration of the constitutional problems arising out of legislative devolution and the Human Rights Act 1998. As the historical orthodoxy is challenged by growing institutional independence, leading figures in the field offer competing perspectives on the future of judicial review. “Confucius was wrong to say that it is a curse to live in interesting times. We are witnessing the development of a constitutional philosophy which recognises fundamental values and gives them effect in the mediation of law to the people”. (Sir John Laws) Contributors Nick Bamforth, Paul Craig, David Dyzenhaus, Mark Elliott, David Feldman, Christopher Forsyth, Brigid Hadfield, Jeffrey Jowell QC, Sir John Laws, Dawn Oliver, Sir Stephen Sedley, Mark Walters. With short responses by: TRS Allan, Stephen Bailey, Robert Carnworth, Martin Loughlin, Michael Taggart, Sir William Wade.

The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1

Download The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1 PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : Oxford University Press
ISBN 13 : 0190075791
Total Pages : 384 pages
Book Rating : 4.98/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1 by : Steven Gow Calabresi

Download or read book The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1 written by Steven Gow Calabresi and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2021-04-13 with total page 384 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This two-volume set examines the origins and growth of judicial review in the key G-20 constitutional democracies, which include the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan, Italy, India, Canada, Australia, South Korea, Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia, Mexico, and the European Union, as well as Israel. The volumes consider five different theories, which help to explain the origins of judicial review, and identify which theories apply best in the various countries discussed. They consider not only what gives rise to judicial review originally, but also what causes of judicial review lead it to become more powerful and prominent over time. Volume One discusses the G-20 common law countries and Israel.

Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review

Download Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
ISBN 13 : 110719024X
Total Pages : 309 pages
Book Rating : 4.45/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review by : Dean R. Knight

Download or read book Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review written by Dean R. Knight and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2018-04-19 with total page 309 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Explores how courts vary the depth of scrutiny in judicial review and the virtues of different approaches.

Common Law Judging

Download Common Law Judging PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher : University of Michigan Press
ISBN 13 : 0472902342
Total Pages : 281 pages
Book Rating : 4.47/5 ( download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Common Law Judging by : Douglas E. Edlin

Download or read book Common Law Judging written by Douglas E. Edlin and published by University of Michigan Press. This book was released on 2020-03-06 with total page 281 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume that subjectivity and objectivity are opposites, with the corollary that subjectivity is a vice and objectivity is a virtue. These assumptions underlie passionate debates over adherence to original intent and judicial activism. In Common Law Judging, Douglas Edlin challenges these widely held assumptions by reorienting the entire discussion. Rather than analyze judging in terms of objectivity and truth, he argues that we should instead approach the role of a judge’s individual perspective in terms of intersubjectivity and validity. Drawing upon Kantian aesthetic theory as well as case law, legal theory, and constitutional theory, Edlin develops a new conceptual framework for the respective roles of the individual judge and of the judiciary as an institution, as well as the relationship between them, as integral parts of the broader legal and political community. Specifically, Edlin situates a judge’s subjective responses within a form of legal reasoning and reflective judgment that must be communicated to different audiences. Edlin concludes that the individual values and perspectives of judges are indispensable both to their judgments in specific cases and to the independence of the courts. According to the common law tradition, judicial subjectivity is a virtue, not a vice.